Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai

Diese Seite ist ein Archiv abgeschlossener Diskussionen. Ihr Inhalt sollte daher nicht mehr verändert werden. Benutze bitte die aktuelle Diskussionsseite, auch um eine archivierte Diskussion weiterzuführen.

Um einen Abschnitt dieser Seite zu verlinken, klicke im Inhaltsverzeichnis auf den Abschnitt und kopiere dann Seitenname und Abschnittsüberschrift aus der Adresszeile deines Browsers, beispielsweise

[[Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#Thema 1]]

oder als Weblink zur Verlinkung außerhalb der Wikipedia

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Stefan_K%C3%BChn/Check_Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#Thema_1

A nice thing to have would be checking for duplicate image captions, e.g. [[File:Example.png|Muh|Mäh]]. I am actually not sure how often that happens, so maybe you want to check that first, but I know that at least en:WP:Twinkle has been producing such broken captions since forever when it tries adding information templates to the caption.
Of course, it should then also check then for other incorrect image syntax: both "border" and "thumb" given, both "left" and "right" given, conflicting sizes, and other things. :)
Thanks for the great tool & Beste Grüße, Amalthea2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Amalthea2-2009-04-30T23:11:00.000Z-Request: duplicate image captions11

The first with Muh and Mäh is very difficult. I will try this. Also I will try the others. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-02T20:35:00.000Z-Amalthea2-2009-04-30T23:11:00.000Z11

Great, thanks for having a look. :) Amalthea2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Amalthea2-2009-05-02T23:14:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-02T20:35:00.000Z11

Hi Stephan, your script complains about http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaal_Standaard_Boeknummer. Maybe it's a good idea to tell your script to handle a plain ISBN-10 or ISBN-13 without any number as correct. Rudolphous Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Rudolphous-2009-05-01T06:06:00.000Z-Code 069: ISBN syntaxfout11

 Ok. I have exclude the article. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-02T20:36:00.000Z-Rudolphous-2009-05-01T06:06:00.000Z11

Dear Stefan,

===This is a headline with reference <ref>A reference with '''bold''' text</ref>===

It should not trigger error 044.

Gabor. --193.6.17.64 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-193.6.17.64-2009-05-01T17:02:00.000Z-Code 44 false positive11

 Ok. I have change error 44. Thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-02T20:33:00.000Z-193.6.17.64-2009-05-01T17:02:00.000Z11

In der vollständigen Fehlerliste ist der Artikel Straßenbahn Berlin nicht aufgeführt, obwohl es dort an einigen Stellen Referenzen mit anschließenden Punkt gibt.--Video2005 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Video2005-2009-05-02T22:24:00.000Z-Error 061 - Referenz mit Satzzeichen11

Das kann schon sein. Das Skript erfasst nur die Artikel, die es findet. Artikel die durch das Raster fallen werden nicht im laufenden Betrieb entdeckt, sondern nur bei dem Vollscan mit dem neuen Dump, der cirka alle 30 Tage kommt. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-03T17:50:00.000Z-Video2005-2009-05-02T22:24:00.000Z11

Danke für den Hinweis. Der Fehler war im Artikel schon seit dem Jahreswechsel enthalten. Ich vermute mal zur Zeit ist die Basisgrundlage der Dump vom 11.03.2009 und demnach wurde wahrscheinlich der Fehler 61 erst später im Script eingefügt. Der letzte Versuch der Dumperzeugung scheint wohl nicht geklappt zu haben, also müssen wir wohl einfach noch ein wenig warten...-- Gruß Video2005 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Video2005-2009-05-03T19:41:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-03T17:50:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, der Link ist immer noch kaputt. :-( Glücklicherweise findet sich unter der Tabelle ein weiterer zur Ausgabeseite der Fehler. Viele Grüße -- Marbot Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Marbot-2009-05-03T17:16:00.000Z-Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Apr#Kaputter Link11

Oups, bei soviel Input kann das leicht passieren, dass man was übersicht. Danke für den erneuten Hinweis. Habs angepasst. Jetzt müssen die Leute nur noch die jeweilige Übersetzung anpassen. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-03T18:20:00.000Z-Marbot-2009-05-03T17:16:00.000Z11

Ist doch halb so wild. Beim neuesten Update (siehe unten) war es alledings noch nicht schick. Viele Grüße -- Marbot Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Marbot-2009-05-03T20:21:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-03T18:20:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, ich habe gerade festgestellt, peinlich für mich, daß Dein Skript lediglich die Seiten überprüft, die zuletzt geändert wurden. Wäre es für pdcwiki möglich, angesichts der relativ geringen Gesamtzahl der Artikel einmalig einen kompletten Scan durchzuführen. Dann weiß ich ungefähr, was noch auf uns zukommt. Wäre schöne wenn es ginge. Viele Grüße vom -- Marbot Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Marbot-2009-05-03T17:19:00.000Z-pdcwiki11

Weil pdcwiki wirklich in 2 Minuten durchgelaufen ist, hab ich nochmal fix einen Lauf über den alten Dump gemacht. Das extra in das Skript mit einzubauen wäre zu aufwändig und sehr fehleranfällig. Deshalb lasse ich das mal lieber. Auf jeden Fall sind jetzt wieder ein paar mehr in der Liste. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-03T19:00:00.000Z-Marbot-2009-05-03T17:19:00.000Z11

Das kann man echt nicht verlangen. Dennoch, auch dieser aktuelle Scan hat ja genug zu Tage gefördert. :-) Herzlichen Dank für Deine Hilfe und viele Grüße -- Marbot Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Marbot-2009-05-03T20:23:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-03T19:00:00.000Z11

Check Wikipedia page says error was found 57 times. List of all articles with error 016 lists 90 articles. On Apr. 24 hu:Rock with You was listed on Check Wikipedia page, now is only on List of all articles with error 016. What has changed? How these characters get in the article? Where they come from? Bean49 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Bean49-2009-05-06T23:13:00.000Z-Error 016 huwiki 211

It seems that it has changed back. How this error can be avoided? Bean49 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Bean49-2009-05-07T11:15:00.000Z-Bean49-2009-05-06T23:13:00.000Z11

Hello Bean49, the error come from the languages, where you write from right to left (for example: Hebrew or Arabic). It can come with copy and past or at other ways in the article. In the article hu:Rock with You I see one of this Unicode Controle Characters after "borító = ". You can see it for example in the editor Notepad++. It is a big problem in templates. For example if you want use the values in templates with geocoordinates or others. I see the first time this problem in a geocoordinate, which make big problems. In my other project Templatetiger I have sometime also problem with this characters. See also this in archive. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-07T20:15:00.000Z-Bean49-2009-05-07T11:15:00.000Z11

Would it be possible to run the check on Template and Mediawiki namespaces? It's more likely that these get pasted into articles if they are present there. -- User:Docu

It is possible, but it will find too much false positive errors. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-04T19:00:00.000Z-Check 1611

That wouldn't be a problem. I don't mind removing them all. It makes it less likely to find them in articles. -- User:Docu

I think that this would be a pretty bad idea... you might not mind removing them all once, but if they are there each time...

Plenty of templates have categories which would be picked up incorrectly, for example. I'm also working on a bot to do a lot of the tasks, and having templates and MediaWiki pages could cause a whole slew of false positives there. How many times have templates or MediaWiki pages been causing a problem? All that I know of was en:Template:Prod2. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-08T21:08:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-04T19:00:00.000Z11

Don't worry. It could be in a report with a new number, so it wont result in changes for check #16.

I checked a series of templates and found a unicode control in the microformat markup of en:Template:Coord/link. This could have resulted in problems when people pasted the coordinates elsewhere. It's possible that the problems commonsdelinker bot had in wp.en came from an interface message. -- User:Docu

Okay; it would make sense if it was in a separate check. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-09T02:53:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-08T21:08:00.000Z11

There is a new stable release of AWB. You might want to add the following to the news section:

[[:en:Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]] in its new [[:en:Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/History|4.5.3.0 release]] includes several features for this project: #57 is fixed automatically; some of #7 are corrected; a special mode assists in fixing brackets (#10, #43, #46, #47) and in some cases, fixes them directly.

-- User:Docu

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-10T06:09:00.000Z-News11

Thank you. -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-10T08:22:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-10T06:09:00.000Z11

Is yesterdays update still running or did it fail? Are you preparing for the new database dump? -- en:User:Docu

Dutch version is also not updated yesterday or today. It looks the script is on 'holiday'. - Robotje Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Robotje-2009-05-09T11:57:00.000Z-en.wp May 8 update11

I just found an explanation here: de:Benutzer:Stefan_Kühn/Check_Wikipedia#News. -- en:User:Docu

I seems on the latest version of checkwiki.pl has problems with some articles. For example Hexachloorfosfazeen (nlwiki). It can't finish scanning this article. When nlwiki_error_list.txt contains also only this article it is not able to complete the scan. Rudolphous Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Rudolphous-2009-05-09T16:58:00.000Z-Robotje-2009-05-09T11:57:00.000Z11

The problem is that too much new dumps available. Normally every 30 days we get a new dump. Now we get every 4 days a new dump. If you know that only enwiki need more then 12 hours, than you know that all 32 languages need more then 4 days. So my scan are not fast enough. I will fix this tonight or in the next days. Maybe I will only use a new dump every 14 days or so. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-09T17:04:00.000Z-Rudolphous-2009-05-09T16:58:00.000Z11

I was just coming to ask. :) Well, more dumps is a good thing for the most part. Hope that you can fix this soon. As it is, we can work on the list we have. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-09T17:36:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-09T17:04:00.000Z11

I have restart the cronjob, but without new dumps. I will test a new way for the dumps in the next days. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-10T06:10:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-09T17:36:00.000Z11

Okay; sounds good. Thanks! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-10T14:55:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-10T06:10:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, very good new error 080 (External link with line break). One minor fix : the description of each error seems to be missing its last character (often a single right square bracket where the should be two right square brackets). Bye -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-10T17:08:00.000Z-Error 080 - character missing11

Can you give me an example for this minor problem? I don't know what exact you mean. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-11T20:28:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-05-10T17:08:00.000Z11

OK your script is fine, I just figured that the last bracket is actually interpreted as matching the starting bracket of the external link :

BTW we increased the priority of this syntax error in French Wikipedia, as it is most often caused by a forgotten or incorrect right bracket and sigificantly affects the resulting text. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-12T00:57:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-11T20:28:00.000Z11

Please see en:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia#Reference. -- en:User:Docu

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-10T08:43:00.000Z-Check 3 at en.wp11

Just a note: I'm not sure if your script picks up both capitalized ({{Reference}}) and uncapitalized ({{reference}}) versions of each tag; if it doesn't that would probably be a good idea. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-10T14:55:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-10T08:43:00.000Z11

Thanks, most or gone now. There is today: en:A4e (using {{Ref-list}}) and en:Lara Croft. -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-12T04:20:00.000Z-Check 3 at en.wp11

• Detect: Page A has links to Page B which is a redirect to Page A.
• Detect: Page A has links to Page B which is a redirect to Page C which is a redirect to Page A.
• Detect: Templates that have links to redirects. --85.23.69.202 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-85.23.69.202-2009-05-14T05:29:00.000Z-Wish list: find Redirects back to the same page11

My script can not detect this three errors. The script check only one article. It don't know nothing about other articles. So I can not detect this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-14T07:04:00.000Z-Wish list: find Redirects back to the same page11

Hi Stefan, this redirect : Brook+ is reported as "Interwiki before last headline", I cannot figure why. See its report. Thanks -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-12T01:33:00.000Z-Unexplained report on 05111

At the moment my script has problem with "+" in the title for article. I will fix this in the next time. My script will check not "Brook+". It will check the article Brook. You will find the error in this article. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-12T10:09:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-05-12T01:33:00.000Z11

I should have guessed. Thanks -- Laddo 199.22.57.2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-199.22.57.2-2009-05-14T11:34:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-12T10:09:00.000Z11

Hi- I was wondering if another common error could be detected, where a pipe is used in an external link as though it were a wikilink; this can cause display issues. Basically, any external link containing a pipe is probably an error. Thanks! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-10T15:10:00.000Z-Pipes in external links11

Good idea. I will try to detect something link [http:/www.wikipedia.org|Wikipedia] -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-11T20:23:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-10T15:10:00.000Z11

Exactly, thanks! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-12T03:10:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-11T20:23:00.000Z11

I have test this and found a link with pipe in pdc:Gordonville,_Pennsilfaani, see:

• • Gordonville, PA: Microsoft Virtual Earth

If I create a new error then we have many false positives. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T20:24:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-12T03:10:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, the French project has been renamed to:

• Projet:Correction syntaxique
• Translation page is Projet:Correction syntaxique/Traduction

Please adjust the script. Thanks for your input.. ;) -- Laddo 199.22.57.2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-199.22.57.2-2009-05-14T11:51:00.000Z-New name for French Check Wikipedia11

 Ok -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T19:44:00.000Z-199.22.57.2-2009-05-14T11:51:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, the French Check Wikipedia report (May 15) was produced in English and with default error activations. Possibly the new name of the translation page that the script uses is not correct. Can you please check this out ? It should be Projet:Correction syntaxique/Traduction. Thanks -- Laddo 199.22.57.2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-199.22.57.2-2009-05-15T11:46:00.000Z-Problem with French Translation11

I know! Because today I read about this change and have no time to fix my script. I will try to fix this tonight. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T12:04:00.000Z-199.22.57.2-2009-05-15T11:46:00.000Z11

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T19:42:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T12:04:00.000Z11

Thanks -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-16T16:19:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T19:42:00.000Z11

This seems to list mainly false positives, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=):-o&action=edit . Completely broken redirects probably appear already in the short pages listing. -- en:User:Docu

The ones listed may work, but they aren't correctly formed (they're lowercase or need a space, for example). -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-16T10:54:00.000Z-Check 36 at en.wp (Redirect not correct)11

Are there any on en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/036 that don't work? -- en:User:Docu

There is a tabulator between redirect and the link. I think there should only be a space. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-16T19:00:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-16T10:54:00.000Z11

This doesn't seem to break it though. The page table has a field "page_is_redirect". If its value is 1, it's a valid redirect. All these could be excluded from the results. -- User:Docu

Then is the tabulator or line break a valid part between redirect and the link. I will insert this in my script. Thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:18:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-16T19:00:00.000Z11

Hi. Could you add a detection for pages with excessive boldface text? Normally on Wikipedia, only first words on first paragraphs are allowed for boldface. I'm thinking of 3 pair of ''' as the limit. What do you think? Thanks. Borgx Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Borgx-2009-05-19T00:28:00.000Z-Feature request: detect excessive boldface text11

Hi Borgx, this is one of my first idea. But there where so much other errors. I will insert this, but I think we should start with 10 pair of of ''' as the limit. :-) -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-19T08:44:00.000Z-Borgx-2009-05-19T00:28:00.000Z11

Can you make the limit as variable so that it can be fine-tuned. Thanks. Borgx Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Borgx-2009-05-20T00:07:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-19T08:44:00.000Z11

Hallo Stefan! In dem Artikel hu:Shannon-entrópiafüggvény wurde der Fehler 019 signalisiert, aber was das Programm gefunden hat, ist kein Titel, sondern ein Formel. Sollte man den Artikel verändern oder kann das Programm eine Ausnahme machen? Grüße --Hkoala Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Hkoala-2009-05-19T11:01:00.000Z-Error 019 / huwiki11

Nein es sollte im Artikel in das <math>...</math> Tag gesetzt werden. Dann gibt es damit keine weiteren Problem. Grüße -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-19T13:52:00.000Z-Hkoala-2009-05-19T11:01:00.000Z11

It may be useful that the script could find articles with exactly the same references on it. For example, if in any article we find twice or more times <ref>example</ref>, we shuold name the reference and use <ref name="foo">, and the following times <ref name="foo" />. It can be interesting that the script could find the articles where that take place. If you don't understand, what I want is to do this. Thanks. Muro de Aguas Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Muro de Aguas-2009-05-20T15:17:00.000Z-Another request11

 Ok, I have insert a new error (81) for this problem. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-21T20:12:00.000Z-Muro de Aguas-2009-05-20T15:17:00.000Z11

The check #3 at the Chinese wiki is reporting some of the pages with the {{Hide ref}} template. For example, the page zh:土卫一. Is it possible to exclude these pages? --Vina Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Vina-2009-05-22T07:31:00.000Z-Check #3 at Chinese wiki (zh)11

 Ok, I have insert this template. Thanks for this info.-- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-22T20:25:00.000Z-Vina-2009-05-22T07:31:00.000Z11

I saw in some article code like this:

; '''name''' : definition

name

definition

It schould be:

; name : definition

name

definition

It's very similar to error 44, but with other wikicode element. Malarz pl Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Malarz pl-2009-05-06T19:50:00.000Z-new error (check)11

What do you think about this proposition? Malarz pl Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Malarz pl-2009-05-22T19:19:00.000Z-Malarz pl-2009-05-06T19:50:00.000Z11

Can you give me an example in an article. I have never seen this in enwiki or dewiki. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-22T20:23:00.000Z-Malarz pl-2009-05-22T19:19:00.000Z11

Is on my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:25:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-22T20:23:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, some contributors to the French project indicated that they would find it easier to correct errors if they knew the title of the section where it was detected. I guess they are looking for a third column in your tabular reports that would provide such info. Is it possible ? For example for « missing braket » detections, numbers 10, 46, 43 and 47. Thanks -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-07T23:32:00.000Z-Sections where errors are detected11

Difficult, but I will try this. I write it on my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:26:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-05-07T23:32:00.000Z11

-- chemiewikibm cwbm 22:19, 13. Mai 2009 (CEST)

Kannst du mir mal ein konkretes Beispiel geben. Es ist sonst sehr mühsam das nachvollziehen. --sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-14T07:02:00.000Z-Warum findet das Skript jetzt auch fehlende Bildbeschreibungen innerhalb von Vor11

1,4-Dioxin, Arachnophilia, Szczebra. Hast du eigentlich irgeneine Kontrolle über dein Skript? -- chemiewikibm cwbm 18:30, 14. Mai 2009 (CEST)

Das Skript habe ich vor gut 1-2 Monaten bei der Erkennung von Bildern im Artikel massiv verbessert. Ein Effekt war danach, dass eben auch solche Bilder in den Vorlagen gefunden werden. Was ja auch nicht schlecht ist. Kontrolle? Naja das Skript läuft nachts voll automatisch und ich bin immer wieder erstaunt, was da so alles gefunden wird. Bevor ich mich aber auf die Suche nach irgendwelchen Bugs mache, frag ich lieber nochmal nach, welche Artikel das genau betrifft. Am Besten beim nächsten Mal gleich die Fehlernummer und 1-2 Beispielartikel mit nennen, dann kann ich präziser antworten. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T19:55:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-14T07:02:00.000Z11

Du bist ein Scherzkeks. Ich frage warum dass so ist? Hättest ja gleich sagen können, dass das Absicht ist, weil du an dem Skript etwas geändert hast. -- chemiewikibm cwbm 20:44, 20. Mai 2009 (CEST)

Hmm, ich weiß jetzt nicht wo der Scherz ist, aber ich hab das Skript halt so flexibel gemacht, das es auch innerhalb von Vorlagen danach sucht, aber nur denn das in eckigen Klammern steht, weil ja bei einigen Vorlagen die Bildunterschrift in der Vorlage generiert wird. Alles klar? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:34:00.000Z-Warum findet das Skript jetzt auch fehlende Bildbeschreibungen innerhalb von Vor11

Could you add a detection for page titles that contains charactars outside Basic Multilingual Plane of Unicode? Such titles may be problematic when processing database dumps. --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Fryed-peach-2009-05-18T01:22:00.000Z-Feature request11

Thank you for this request. Did you mean a check like error 16 only for title? Can you give me an example of article and which characters do you mean. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:27:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-05-18T01:22:00.000Z11

Some characters such as "𩺊" (U+29E8A), which was once redirected to ja:アラ, is prohibited for use in page titles in Japanese Wikipedia because it is outside BMP (from U+0000 to U+FFFF). --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Fryed-peach-2009-05-19T02:51:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:27:00.000Z11

I have no idea how to make this, but I will try it. I write this on my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:31:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-05-19T02:51:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, on nlwiki we have a few pages that are not wrong. These pages are included in each scanrun output. Is it possible to make a special page for each wiki (like that translationpages) that is read by your script to exclude a certain number of pages? Rudolphous Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Rudolphous-2009-05-18T18:19:00.000Z-Exclude false positives11

I think it is better to update my script or to update the article. I will not create a list with false positives for every language. Please give my the name of the articles and the error and I will check this in my script. If my script has a problem with this article, then maybe also other parser had a problem with this articles. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-19T13:55:00.000Z-Rudolphous-2009-05-18T18:19:00.000Z11

Oke, I dump here some examples:

Hello Rudolphous! 1.) no this is not god syntax in an article. I think it is better to use one date and to write this without template-things. 2.) I think this was repair by an user. 3+4+5) interessting problem. I will try to fix this. I write this at my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T19:31:00.000Z-Exclude false positives11

Added 6-10. If 3,4,5,6 are fixed than all 054's are done. I didn't write the wikicode for 1, but since the page works and "today" is the most interesting date to explain how the calander works, I let the article how it is. Rudolphous

For detection 080 (External link with line break), you should skip line breaks within templates used inside the link description. fr:Critique de l'islam gets detected due to a break within our template equivalent to Vorlage:Literatur, where line breaks are useful. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-23T16:40:00.000Z-Allow line breaks in templates inside external link descriptions11

Hello Laddo, the problem is that the description of this link is a template. My script search in this link for a blank like [http://www.web.fr descripton]. If my script found this blank then it know, there is a description. But in fr:Critique de l'islam there was no blank before the template. So my script think this part is also the link. If you insert a blank before the template in this link then my script not detect this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T20:11:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-05-23T16:40:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, new detection 081 (Link to other wikiproject) should distinguish links to w:, that seem just an improper way to link to the English Wikipedia. See this correction. Thanks -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-23T16:58:00.000Z-Separate detection for links to Wikipedia11

See Links to other wikiprojects. Did you mean that I should exclude "w:"? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T20:16:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-05-23T16:58:00.000Z11

No, I guess it is a distinct error: linking from wikipedia to wikipedia should not use the interwiki syntax. In wikipedia of any language, links like [[w:article]] or [[wikipedia:article]] should be written [[:en:article]]. More generally, [[w:XX:article]], should be written as [[:XX:article]] in order to link to language XX. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-66.131.214.76-2009-05-23T21:36:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T20:16:00.000Z11

Is it possible to also report a line number for an error text? It would be very helpful. --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Fryed-peach-2009-05-10T15:53:00.000Z-Error reports with line number11

This is not possible for every error. My script work without linenumbers and sometime I delete for the process the line breaks. So it is very difficult to find the correct line number. In which error you need this? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-11T20:25:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-05-10T15:53:00.000Z11

Especially for error 60 "Template parameter with problem". It only reports template names and some texts like a parameter name, but it's hard to find the true problem when that page uses the template many times. --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Fryed-peach-2009-05-12T13:50:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-11T20:25:00.000Z11

I write this on my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:31:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-05-12T13:50:00.000Z11

I'm not sure if this would help that much for number 60. At least in en.wp, the error is generally quite visible around the section shown in the report (easy) or it's one or several field before (more complex). For the later, the line number probably wouldn't help, as it would be wrong. -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-24T03:43:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:31:00.000Z11

Would it be possible to not mark reflists/references tags in tables as being problematic? I don't think they really are. Cheers, Jarry1250 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Jarry1250-2009-05-15T19:16:00.000Z-Error #003 (en Wikipedia)11

See above: #Check_3_at_en.wp - a few redirects don't seem to be recognized. -- en:User:Docu

 Ok, I think I have all templates for references. If you find a new one then tell me this. Please with an example of article. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:37:00.000Z-Jarry1250-2009-05-15T19:16:00.000Z11

Thanks. In the meantime, people started replacing the redirects with the target template. This fixed it as well. -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-24T03:39:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:37:00.000Z11

My bot is working on the lists from the above checks, trying to convert "ISBN-13:"/"ISBN-10:" to "ISBN ", if it's followed by 10/13 digits (and hyphens). The list of today on en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia#ISBN wrong syntax (AutoEd) includes several that didn't get converted, this includes:

• articles with en:Template:ISBN-13 (e.g. en:Alejandro Estrada) or en:Template:ISBN-10
• articles that use the form "ISBN-10: ISBN 1234567890" (e.g. en:Allagoptera)
• there is also: ISBN 9780374168094 (ISBN-13)
  ISBN 0374168091 (ISBN-10) (e.g. en:After This).

Just in case you want to include one or the other in your script. -- User:Docu

Thanks for this input. I think you can delete this template ISBN-13 in enwiki. Why they use this? - I will try to fix the other errors. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-21T05:02:00.000Z-check 69 on en.wp11

There are two templates: ISBN-10 and ISBN-13. I think the answer is here: en:User_talk:D6#Editing_ISBN_numbers. BTW does the script check for "ISBN:" instead of "ISBN"? -- User:Docu

I write this at my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T19:55:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-21T05:02:00.000Z11

Thanks. This list now consists mainly of false positives. -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-24T03:36:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T19:55:00.000Z11

The other day, I worked on the above list. At en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia#Headline_ALL_CAPS, there are now several acronyms, e.g. ISSN/OCLC/LCCN, NSWRL/ARL/NRL. Would you skip these and also en:Data Definition Language and en:Database Console Commands (Transact-SQL)? -- en:User:Docu

I will detect the "/" or "&" inside the headline. I hope this help. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T20:01:00.000Z-check 058 at en.wp11

Good idea. It would. This list already included a series of false positives. Since the scan of the full dump, it just gets longer. -- en:User:Docu

Another one to exclude could be if the section header includes the page name (e.g. on today's list there is en:RECSAM, en:ERDAS IMAGINE, en:FILECOMP). -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-24T06:39:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T20:01:00.000Z11

Die Seite bekommt eine komische Struktur. Nach unten hin wird die Schrift kleiner und eingerückt. Außerdem werden die tags entfernt. Ein einfaches Copy&Paste ist daher nicht mehr möglich. Oder liegt das daran, das mein Browser dort etwas interpretiert, was eigentlich normaler Text sein soll? Ich kann mir aber vorstellen, das auch anderen das Problem haben werden. Vielleicht gibt es eine andere Möglichkeit. Hat jemand eine Idee? Der Umherirrende Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Umherirrender-2009-05-14T18:28:00.000Z-Übersetzungsseite auf dem Toolserver11

Du meinst diese Datei? Wenn ja, die wird bei mir überall als einfacher Text dargestellt. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T08:27:00.000Z-Umherirrender-2009-05-14T18:28:00.000Z11

Da, die Datei meinte ich. Bei mir (IE7) werden die HTML-Tags erkannt und umgesetzt. Somit habe ich fetten Text, Einrückungen und verkleinerte Schrift und die Tags fehlen. Das macht das C&P unmöglich. Aber wenn es bei dir als normaler Text dargestellt wird, muss ich mir mal etwas überlegen. Danke trotzdem, auch wenn du nichts machen kannst. Der Umherirrende Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Umherirrender-2009-05-17T12:36:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-15T08:27:00.000Z11

Habs noch nie mit IE porbiert, aber jetzt sehe ich es auch. Bisher hatte sich noch niemand beschwert. Scheinen alle Firefox zu nutzen. Werde nix am Skript ändern, das es mit FF funktioniert. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:16:00.000Z-Umherirrender-2009-05-17T12:36:00.000Z11

Ich nutze jetzt "Quelltext betrachten", damit wird es problemlos dargestellt. Ich glaube der FireFox stellt nicht-HTML-Seiten (Also Seiten ohne die Endung .html oder .htm) einfach nicht in HTML dar, was ja auch vernünftig ist. Der Umherirrende Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Umherirrender-2009-05-24T14:53:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:16:00.000Z11

I don't understand this error. On nlwiki/checkwikipedia there are 40 occurences of this error. Can somebody explain this error and show how it can be fixed? Rudolphous Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Rudolphous-2009-05-25T17:18:00.000Z-Code 080: External link with line break11

In the most articles is no end of the link. So my script found

[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia
And more text abc...

After "Wikipedia" is no end "]" and so the script think there is no end of the description for this link. But if the script found a line break then it know there is a broken external link. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-25T19:21:00.000Z-Rudolphous-2009-05-25T17:18:00.000Z11

Oke got it, will try to fix them. Rudolphous Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Rudolphous-2009-05-26T17:30:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-25T19:21:00.000Z11

Can you and checking for {{forrás}}? We use this template instead of <references />. Thanks! – dani> from huwiki 06:14, 26. Mai 2009 (CEST)

It's better to use pywikipedia (replace.py) to replace all occurance of <references /> with {{forrás}}. Borgx Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Borgx-2009-05-26T08:39:00.000Z-Check #3 at Hungarian Wikipedia11

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-26T20:24:00.000Z-Borgx-2009-05-26T08:39:00.000Z11

You haven't closed <nowiki> tag: [1]. Malarz pl Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Malarz pl-2009-05-26T11:55:00.000Z-check 83: error in default description11

Thanks. I will fix this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-26T12:16:00.000Z-Malarz pl-2009-05-26T11:55:00.000Z11

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-26T20:24:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-26T12:16:00.000Z11

The result from this list got a bit long. Would it be possible to split this scan into two or three different lists?

• 1. articles with no heading at level "=="
• 2. articles with only standard appendices at level "==" (e.g. "References?", "External [Ll]inks?", "Works", "See [Aa]lso", "Further [Rr]eading", "Notes", "Footnotes")
• 3. all others.

If this is too complex, at least a separate list for the first one would be helpful. -- en:User:Docu

I can split the error nr. 007, but I can't support 2., because we have in all other languages other names for this. But I think the 1. is very easy and this would help you. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T20:33:00.000Z-Check 7 at en.wp11

This would help. (1.) is more or less fixed automatically (also by AWB). (2.) is fixed automatically, but needs to be supervised. BTW when you change the reports, could you use #7 for (1.) and add the remaining ones with a new number. This way the full list gets updated faster (an estimated one third is already fixed). -- User:Docu

BTW, for this check, would you skip articles that us en:Template:CSRT-Yes. It includes a level "==" header and is sometimes followed by a level "===" header. -- en:User:Docu Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Docu-2009-05-26T03:40:00.000Z-Check 7 at en.wp11

This template is very bad. Please delete this. It is never a good thing to outsource a chapter including the headlines in a template. I have never seen this in on of the other wikipedias. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-27T06:57:00.000Z-Docu-2009-05-26T03:40:00.000Z11

I agree with you, but it's somewhat bit outside the scope of my current clean-up. -- en:User:Docu

Hi. Please add template {{Shortcut|ВП:ССО}} to the output for ruwiki. Thanks, LimeHat Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-LimeHat-2009-05-28T15:43:00.000Z-Feature request/ruwiki11.

Add it in ru:Википедия:Страницы с ошибками в викитексте/Перевод by yourself. (Section start text). It is no problem. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-29T07:18:00.000Z-LimeHat-2009-05-28T15:43:00.000Z11

I think that on en.wiki, slashes are permitted in article names without the need for a DEFAULTSORT. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-31T01:56:00.000Z-"/" is okay11

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-01T15:52:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-31T01:56:00.000Z11

Thanks! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-06-01T21:16:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-01T15:52:00.000Z11

We have another set of templates in Chinese that redirects to {{Reflist}} {{ReflistH}} {{ReflistF}} , called

{{註腳}} {{註腳h}} {{註腳f}}

Could you exclude pages with these templates as well?　Thank you. --Vina Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Vina-2009-05-31T07:00:00.000Z-check #3 at Chinese wiki (zh) again11

 Ok. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-01T15:46:00.000Z-Vina-2009-05-31T07:00:00.000Z11

[2] includes a few redirects from en:Category:Redirects from Chinese words/names, en:Category:Redirects from Korean words/names. Possibly redirects should be excluded all together. --- User:Docu

Is on my To-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:22:00.000Z-Check 3711

Can be archived. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-09T20:08:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-23T13:22:00.000Z11

In en.wp, there is a standard sequence to be used for some of the sections. It is outlined at en:Wikipedia:Layout#Standard_appendices ("Location:"). Would it be possible to list articles where this sequence isn't followed? -- en:User:Docu

I think this is very difficult to detect. And in every languages they haye other standards. I think this is a problem which can only solve a bot for enwiki and not my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:13:00.000Z-Layout11

Can be archived. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-09T20:08:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:13:00.000Z11

Hi, I am Ricky Lau from Chinese Wikipedia. I am glad that there is now Check Wikipedia Project so that problems in articles can be found easily. Thanks for great work first ;). I would like to ask if it is possible to split this output file into few pieces (e.g. one piece per a group of problem in same priority), then output to different page and include in wikiproject page? Just like that:

• High priority jobs are output to a file;
• Medium priority jobs are output to another file;
• Lowest priority jobs are output to the file different from above;
• In main WikiProject page, use template to include these lists.

As I found the output file is over 300kb currently, and it seems impossible to just copy everything from output file to that page directly according to instruction you wrote, therefore I am thinking if we can update the page part by part. Thanks.
Ricky Lau^(UTC) @ 2009-5-16 (Sa) 22:30 (UTC+8)

I have done what I thought, it was done more easily than updating single page…Ricky Lau^(UTC) @ 2009-5-16 (Sa) 23:37 (UTC+8)

By the way, in output file there is an error link that link to http://toolserver.org/~sk/checkwiki//_output_for_wikipedia.txt (At "What can you do" section)
Ricky Lau^(UTC) @ 2009-5-16 (Sa) 23:08 (UTC+8)

Hello Ricky, thanks for updating the Chiniese Wikipedia. In enwiki we had the same problem with the big file. They solve it for a week or so with three templates. A template for every priority. So they can update each template from the big output file. - Thanks for the information about this error-link. I think I have fix this, but I will check this again. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:24:00.000Z-Split WikiProject page11

Can be archived. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-09T20:08:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-05-18T07:24:00.000Z11

Here are two errors that I think it would be useful for your script to detect, if they are possible:

• DEFAULTSORTs which have a sortkey identical to the page's name (these can be removed).
• Pages where every category has an identical sortkey but no DEFAULTSORT (the individual sortkeys can be removed and a DEFAULTSORT should be added).

Thanks! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Drilnoth-2009-05-20T13:53:00.000Z-Two requests11

I think the first is not so important, but I write this at my To-do-list. -- sk

Can be archived. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/Mai#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-06-09T20:08:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-05-20T13:53:00.000Z11