Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/März

Users on French Wiki report false positives on "Template not correct end", detection 43, unclosed "{{":

<math>\frac{{-1}^i}{(2i)!}</math> is correct since it brings ${\displaystyle {\frac {{-1}^{i}}{(2i)!}}}$.

Also there are false positives on "Template not correct begin", detection 47, unopened "}}":

<math>n = 1 + (n_s - 1) \times { (\frac{p} {p_s}) \times { (\frac{T_s} {T}) }}</math> is correct since it brings ${\displaystyle n=1+(n_{s}-1)\times {({\frac {p}{p_{s}}})\times {({\frac {T_{s}}{T}})}}}$.

Possibly suspend these detection within math scopes. Thanks --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-01T17:40:00.000Z-Math causes false positives on bracket detection11

 Ok! Yesterday, I have change a simple thing in my math-detection-programm. But I make a mistake. I have fix this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-01T18:00:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-01T17:40:00.000Z11

Hallo Stefan! Bei Nahwa meldet dein Skript eine fehlende Bildbeschreibung. Die ist jedoch sehr wohl da, nur an einem ungewöhnlichen Platz angegeben (vor "thumb" usw). Das sollte zwar eher die Ausnahme sein, aber mitteilen will ich dir das trotzdem. lg, → «« Man77 »» Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Man77-2009-03-02T00:25:00.000Z-"Fehlende" Bildbeschreibung nur an anderer Stelle11

Siehe hier: Wikipedia_Diskussion:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia#Bilder_ohne_Beschreibung. Sollte eigentlich besser an den Standard aller Bilder angepasst werden. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-02T18:27:00.000Z-Man77-2009-03-02T00:25:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, I believe it would be interesting info it you could add the total number of articles that were scanned in the summary section at the top, for example following «Last scan: The script found 37701 errors in 30468 articles; 0000000 inspected ». French wiki hit the 40000 limit lately and it would have been interesting to know how many were not scanned. --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-02T14:06:00.000Z-Improvement to summary information11

Hello! My script has a limit of 40000 errors. I set this limit only for one reason. If I program subroutine for error detection and make a mistake, then my script can't crash the toolserver. When the script scan the new dump of frwiki then it finish this after 40000 errors and write this errorlist with 30468 articles. I don't known how much errors total in the frwiki-dump. If I set the limit higher then the scan will need more then 4 hours. To this list of 30468 articles every morning I add a list of new articles (2165 from the last 48 hours) and last recent changes (4900 from the last 48 hours (every 3h I take 500 changes)). So I think at the moment every morning 30468+2165+4900 = ~37500 articles will be scanned. I think also at the moment the limit is ok. If after the next dump the number of errors lower then 40000 then you see that I have scan the full dump. - I write this feature "123 inspected" at my to-do-list. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-02T19:13:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-02T14:06:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, thanks a lot, this is extremely interesting info that I transmited to the French Discussion page. We elected to deactivate detection of <small> that was producing 12750 detections. Let's hope that all articles will be scanned next week. Thanks again --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-03T03:06:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-02T19:13:00.000Z11

Hello again! On the English Wikipedia, the tag en:Template:Reference isn't being counted as a <references /> tag. Could you add that to your script? Thanks. -Drilnoth Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-02T20:54:00.000Z-References11

 Ok, I have insert this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-03T15:15:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-03-02T20:54:00.000Z11

Great; thanks. -Drilnoth Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-03T21:43:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-03T15:15:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, I noticed (French wiki again) that you started substituting &lt; for < and &gt; for > in the report, likely to deactivate HTML code from the translation pages. I believe it is an excellent idea and will reduce the number of problems arising from translation (also this is a first step toward using anchors -- ankertext like this one -- in the summary at the top!)

Note however that this change deactivated the text colouring that you used recently to highlight the newer detections :

<span style="color:#e80000;">

Now this text appears on the error report (unless it was removed at translation). It is up to you, but I guess it would be better to avoid using HTML in the English text of the translation page if you wish to retain that "<" and ">" replacement. Thanks again --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-03T15:19:00.000Z-Replacement of "<" and ">"11

Yesterday, I make a main change in the script. Now I use for the text the API. Like this. Today I see this problem and I hope I can fix it. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-03T19:24:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-03T15:19:00.000Z11

 Ok, I change my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-03T20:37:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-03T19:24:00.000Z11

Article contains a "#if:" or "#if exist" or "#switch:" or "{{NAMESPACE}}" or "{{SITENAME}}" or "{{PAGENAME}}" or "{{FULLPAGENAME}}" or "{{{1}}}" (Parameter).

nl:Geschiedenis van de wiskunde

Tussen 400 v. Chr. en 200 n. Chr. bestudeerden Indische wiskundigen, met name de

Why is this article counted as error? Thanks for all your efforts.

87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-03T16:55:00.000Z-Code 034: Template programming element11

In this section is {{{feit}} with 3x"{{{". -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-03T19:12:00.000Z-87.212.82.171-2009-03-03T16:55:00.000Z11

The Swedish (sv.wikipedia) synonym for DEFAULTSORT is STANDARDSORTERING. The Swedish synonym for REDIRECT is OMDIRIGERING. For File:...thumb...left...right we now write Fil:...miniatyr...vänster...höger. --LA2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-LA2-2009-03-01T12:25:00.000Z-DEFAULTSORT in Swedish11

At the moment I have hardcode this MagicWords in my script. In the future I will use the API with this Result. But at the moment I write at an other part of my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-01T18:02:00.000Z-LA2-2009-03-01T12:25:00.000Z11

STANDARDSORTERING is still not recognized in report 37. --LA2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-LA2-2009-03-04T09:11:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-01T18:02:00.000Z11

The article ca:Vafþrúðnismál doesn't have DEFAULTSORT or ORDENA, and is never flagged. --JoRobot Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-JoRobot-2009-03-03T18:38:00.000Z-False negative for DEFAULTSORT11

The script only checks accents in the first 3 characters since in general only the first few characters play a role in the alphabetical ordering of articles in their categories. --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-04T02:32:00.000Z-JoRobot-2009-03-03T18:38:00.000Z11

Wie wäre es mit einer Liste aus Seiten die nicht vorhandene(gelöschte?) Bilder einbinden? S. auch hier. MfG, º the Bench º ^WikiWartung Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-º the Bench º-2009-03-05T17:41:00.000Z-Seiten, die nicht vorhandene Bilder einbinden11

Generell wäre das nicht schlecht, aber leider fehlt mir dazu die Technik. Ich nutze nicht die Datenbank auf dem Toolserver und kann deshalb dort auch nicht mit SQL nach den entsprechenden Bildern fahnden. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-05T19:21:00.000Z-º the Bench º-2009-03-05T17:41:00.000Z11

The list for the English Wikipedia wasn't updated for March 5th... I don't know if it's just running really late or if there's a bug, but I thought I'd let you know. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-05T23:40:00.000Z-Update?11

Here you can find the update. I change from txt to html. Now we have no problems with UTF-8. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-06T07:32:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-03-05T23:40:00.000Z11

Ah... great! A much appreciated change. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-06T19:28:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-06T07:32:00.000Z11

Please disable the detection for error 043 within <pre> tags. --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Fryed-peach-2009-03-05T07:01:00.000Z-Template not correct end11

Hello Fryed-peach, can you give me an example? I detect "pre" in all articles, so in error 43 it should not be a problem. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-05T19:16:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-03-05T07:01:00.000Z11

An old version of ja:tanasinn was listed, then "fixed" by this edit, and now not listed. --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Fryed-peach-2009-03-08T17:32:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-05T19:16:00.000Z11

Hi Stephan, possibly your script could detect use of HTML … instead of symbol « … ». Bye --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-08T16:13:00.000Z-New detection of HTML ellipsis11

Thanks for this info. I will test it. Maybe next weekend I have time to make this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-08T16:39:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-08T16:13:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan. On it.wiki we use the it:Template:Bio where a parameter is the category, with square brackets. The template is placed at the beginning of the page, [1], so it generates a lot of false positives. Anyway, it's not urgent. Thanks. --Red Power Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Red Power-2009-03-09T20:22:00.000Z-error 5211

Hello Red Power, I never seen this construct. Only in IT you have this. I don't think that this is a good construction. In all other wikipedia we write the categories at the end or invisible inside a template, but never like this. I think it is better you change this template or you deactivate this error in IT. IMHO it is better to change this bad template. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:25:00.000Z-Red Power-2009-03-09T20:22:00.000Z11

I'd like to destroy that monster! Unfortunately it's used in 97.000 biographies, and I believe it's the most complex template of ALL the wiki projects... I've disabled the error, and I'll try to find a way to change the template. Thanks anyway. --Red Power Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Red Power-2009-03-11T21:33:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:25:00.000Z11

The article sv:Elitserien i ishockey 2008/2009 with nested tables was falsely reported as a table that doesn't end. --LA2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-LA2-2009-03-09T21:22:00.000Z-Nested table11

Oh, yes this is wrong. This is a known error. I will change this in the future, but at the moment I work at an other part of this project. Thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:27:00.000Z-LA2-2009-03-09T21:22:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, with 53 detection types, it has now become difficult to locate a given section in the WikiCheck report: some long sections separate shorter ones. Possible improvements:

1. Organise your summary report at the top to group error types according to priorities, like the report itself
2. Add an anchored link for Top/Middle/Lowest priority in the summary so that users can quickly jump to each such section
3. Allow more priorities (up to 10 ?) so that we can better separate error types that require long-lasting effort from those that are fully resolved and just require maintenance.

When you can find time, of course, I see you are quite busy !  ;) Bye --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-09T22:04:00.000Z-Improve the summary of the report11

Hello IP, thanks for this infos. To 1.) This is a good point. I thinks this is possible. To 2.) At the moment I have no idea how to make this. I try this, but I had problems with the different languages of the headlines. To 3.) I think three is enough. It is like an traffic light (only green, yellow and red). If I make more priorities we will have an endless discussion about an error. Is this error priority 5, 6 or 7. With three levels we have enough. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:58:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-09T22:04:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan

Most of the instances of <big> and <u> in the Norwegian Wikipedia are not errors. Could you please deactivate the scans for these? Could you also deactivate the scans for em and en dash, as the amount of these indicate that they are not considered errors in our wiki?

Thank you & keep up the good work! --Helt Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Helt-2009-03-09T12:04:00.000Z-Deactivation in the Norwegian wiki11

Hi, you can activate and deactivate individual detection types from your translation page, by assigning 0 to the value of the corresponding variable, like : error_000_prio_XXwiki=0. In French WikiCheck, we added comments clarifying this under the «priority» heading of the translation page. --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-09T22:15:00.000Z-Helt-2009-03-09T12:04:00.000Z11

Hello Helt, I see you found the way. :-) -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:15:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-09T22:15:00.000Z11

I did, thank you. --Helt Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Helt-2009-03-12T06:27:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:15:00.000Z11

Hello, there is little problem: In some articles there are naviboxes, but not included through template, but like pseudotemplate. eg. in cs:Boháňka is

{{HlavičkaObecNav|Boháňka|Boháňka|Obec}}
[[Boháňka]] |
[[Chloumek (Boháňka)|Chloumek]] |
[[Skála (Boháňka)|Skála]] |
[[Votuz]]
{{PatičkaObecNav}}  

Would it be possible to ignore selflinks between {{HlavičkaObecNav}} and {{PatičkaObecNav}} in cs.wiki? This is used in about 1000 articles JAn Dudík Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-JAn Dudík-2009-03-09T00:10:00.000Z-Title in text11

I think it is the best to fix this in the articles. It is an error. I know that it is very easy to make this bold with this syntax, but it is not right. Make it with a bot. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:11:00.000Z-JAn Dudík-2009-03-09T00:10:00.000Z11

But these selflinks have it's own sense - easier copying to other articles, because this are subst:NaviTemplates. JAn Dudík Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-JAn Dudík-2009-03-12T13:07:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:11:00.000Z11

This is right. At the time you create this insert, it is very easy. But after this insert, every time you find with every script this selflink. At the moment there are 423 article with this error in cswiki. Maybe there are more, for example 5000. If you are four men then you can fix very day 100 articles (only 25 per person) and in 50 days this is never a problem. I have no idea, how to fix this problem in my script. Also I want find selflinks in templates. So please change it or deactivate this error. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-12T14:56:00.000Z-JAn Dudík-2009-03-12T13:07:00.000Z11

The Swedish Wikipedia page ++ produces several false reports, probably because something goes wrong with its strange title. The correct URL is %2B%2B --LA2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-LA2-2009-03-02T12:14:00.000Z-++11

I will check this later. At the moment I have kick this article from the list. Thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-02T19:19:00.000Z-LA2-2009-03-02T12:14:00.000Z11

In der lateinischen Wikipedia wird der folgende Fehler angezeigt:

Was daran seltsam ist: Der in der Fehlermeldung genannte Text ([[C++]] lingua programmanda ex lingua C creata.==Origo) kommt in der Seite la:C++ gar nicht vor … --UV Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-UV-2009-03-13T22:34:00.000Z-Title in text 211

Also ich glaube mein Skript hat ein Problem mit dem Textholen, wenn ein "+" im Titel enthalten ist. Der erwähnte Text stammt aus dem Artikel la:C. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-14T17:01:00.000Z-UV-2009-03-13T22:34:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, this seems like a false positive for 047 on French wiki:

Front de flamme

...ée de D sur tau">u_L \simeq \sqrt{\frac{D_T}{\tau}}

The complete line is:

<math title="vitesse égale racine carrée de D sur tau">u_L \simeq \sqrt{\frac{D_T}{\tau}}</math>

which brings:

${\displaystyle u_{L}\simeq {\sqrt {\frac {D_{T}}{\tau }}}}$

Possibly argument «title» in «math» confuses the detection. --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-06T20:36:00.000Z-< math > not correctly detected11

Thanks for this information. I will change this in my script, but at moment I have no time. Maybe next weekend I can change this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-08T16:29:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-06T20:36:00.000Z11

 Ok, I have insert this in my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T08:59:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-08T16:29:00.000Z11

Hi. I wonder whether it is possible or not to generate a check wikipedia report for Arabic wikipedia? --Ciphers Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Ciphers-2009-03-12T06:12:00.000Z-request to add Arabic wikipedia11

I will try it at the weekend. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-12T09:28:00.000Z-Ciphers-2009-03-12T06:12:00.000Z11

 Ok. You find the output here. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T08:59:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-12T09:28:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, we got this false positive in French wiki :

== Acte au sens d'''instrumentum'' ==

The script does not distinguish the case of an apostrophe followed by italics.

Bye --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-09T02:04:00.000Z-False positive in error 44 « Headlines in bold »11

Very interesting, but do you think that we need italics in our headlines? I don't think so. I think every special font design is wrong in headlines. We had one css for all headlines and this is enough. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-11T20:13:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-09T02:04:00.000Z11

Hello Mr Kühn.

Italics in title is sometimes OK. If someone wants to devote a whole section to a painting from Monet, like Impression, soleil levant, he could insert :

== On the importance of Impression, soleil levant ==

Cantons-de-l'Est Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Cantons-de-l11

The detection should be more precise :

• It should not detect titles like this :
  • == L'''Africa'' sous les Antonins == ,
• but should detect
  • == L''''Africa''' sous les Antonins == .

Regards, Cantons-de-l'Est Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Cantons-de-l11

Hello Cantons-de-l'Est, please say Stefan! For this headline you can also write

• == On the importance of "Impression, soleil levant" ==
• == On the importance of Impression, soleil levant ==

It has the same information. We don't need this italic in headlines. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T08:58:00.000Z-Cantons-de-l11

As for your information we usually try to respect the typographic requirements as for titles of book, even in headlines :) In french, (I don't know for any other language), it's required (if I'm not mistaking) to write in Italic for various cases (except for h1): for those who understand french fr:Wikipédia:Conventions_typographiques#Italique. We usually avoid to use quotes/double quotes for showpieces. Loreleil Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Loreleil-2009-03-16T16:25:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T08:58:00.000Z11

I will try to fix this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T19:14:00.000Z-Loreleil-2009-03-16T16:25:00.000Z11

 Ok, I have change my script. If I found '' and no ' before or behind in a headline with ''', then I will not declare this as error. Thanks for your information, this helps to improve the script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T19:22:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T19:14:00.000Z11

hello, "Ascii art" is detected also in comments like here : http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warcraft&action=edit&section=9 I don't think it's a good idea... Al1-fr Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-fr-2009-03-16T09:43:00.000Z-error 5611

Normaly the script exclude the comments for this error. I will check this. Thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T12:44:00.000Z-Al1-fr-2009-03-16T09:43:00.000Z11

I have found the problem. This is a bug in my script. I detect <!--> as an complete comment. I will fix this tonight. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T12:55:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T12:44:00.000Z11

Thanks ! Al1-fr Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-fr-2009-03-16T13:55:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T12:55:00.000Z11

 Ok, I have changed my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T17:16:00.000Z-Al1-fr-2009-03-16T13:55:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan. I wonder why the program didn't gave an error 3 (<ref> without <referenes>) in this version] of da:Saturn V? I it is checked as it was on the 2009-03-15 list with an error 48 (title in text). Regards, Byrial Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Byrial-2009-03-16T12:35:00.000Z-Existing error 3 not found11

My script don't check all articles. When this article was in the last dump ok, then I don't find it now. An other script find changes in the Wikipedia. But I don't use all change, because this is to much. If this error in the next dump, then my script will find it. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T12:48:00.000Z-Byrial-2009-03-16T12:35:00.000Z11

The error with the missing <references> tag must have been in the last dump, as it was introduced in the article in an edit from September 12, 2007 and have been there until today when I fixed it. So I suppose that could be an error in your script since the error was not detected. Byrial Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Byrial-2009-03-16T13:20:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T12:48:00.000Z11

I found the problem. The <ref> is inside a table. When my script check the article it exclude the tables at the moment. So I don't find the <ref>. Yes my script is not perfect. :-) -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T13:29:00.000Z-Byrial-2009-03-16T13:20:00.000Z11

Hello (again) ; it would be nice to have a list of titles ( == == ) with :

• a bad capitalization (all in caps : == SUGGESTION (WISH LIST !)==)
• an ending ":" (==Suggestion :==)

In french wiki, I found some of them thanks to error 44. I found some copyright violations with this format (the author has only added title marks), so I think it is an interesting case Al1-fr Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-fr-2009-03-16T14:04:00.000Z-Suggestion (wish list !)11

 Ok, I have insert both errors. But for this with capitalization I also test the length of this headline. Only if the length bigger then 10 (without "=" and " ") then my script say this is an error. So a normal abbreviation like "== UNO ==" is not a problem. I hope this is ok and we find not so much false errors. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T17:44:00.000Z-Al1-fr-2009-03-16T14:04:00.000Z11

The correct character for Em dash (—) = "\u2014" and for En dash (–) "\u2013". Why replacing those characters? Is there a Wikipedia guideline that says that character 2013 in the source is preferred above the HTML entity – ?

2013 and 2014 are outside the normal characterrange (ASCII 32-127) and replacing the characters make the source more difficult to process. Character 2013 looks in the edit window like a minus sign, but those characters visual appear differently (differently rendered by the browser).

87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-15T11:44:00.000Z-mdash or ndash11

Hello IP, my intention is that this code &ndash; and &mdash; is not so good like the correct Unicode character. I will not replace the Unicode character, I will only replace this variante with code. I hope I have found the right words. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T14:25:00.000Z-87.212.82.171-2009-03-15T11:44:00.000Z11

I do not fully understand it. Can you give an example where you solved the problem? 87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-15T15:34:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T14:25:00.000Z11

Sorry, this was my fault. This code "&ndash;" has to relpace by the correct Unicode. So that we have in the article text only the unicode and not the code "&ndash;".-- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T19:37:00.000Z-87.212.82.171-2009-03-15T15:34:00.000Z11

See this one in French Wikipedia. --66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-16T23:25:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T19:37:00.000Z11

Oke clear. On the Dutch wikipedia all the ndash and mdash are replaced. 87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-17T17:56:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-16T23:25:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, HTML symbol < p > is necessary within <blockquote> blocks since it does not allow normal «white line » paragraph separation, for example :

<blockquote>Paragraph one...

Paragraph two.</blockquote>

brings

Paragraph one... Paragraph two.

Please exclude blockquotes from this detection, if possible. Note that in French Wikipedia we use template {{Citation bloc|quote text}} as an equivalent to the <blockquote></blockquote> pair. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-16T23:43:00.000Z-Exclude blockquotes from error 39 < p >11

Thanks for this info. At the moment I don't detect this blockquote. But I can include this in the future. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-17T21:07:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-16T23:43:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, some of the items listed in new error 54 span 5-15 lines, which is making that section of the WikiCheck report uselessly large. I suggest that you retain at most 60 characters (or so), so that if it is longer, you output <first 30 char>...<last 30 char>. Just a suggestion, of course...  ;) -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-17T01:10:00.000Z-Shorter text for error 54 (Line break at the end of a list item)11

Good idea, I will try this in the next days. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-17T09:12:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-17T01:10:00.000Z11

 Ok, I have change this in my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-17T21:03:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-17T09:12:00.000Z11

The perl script seems to need suddenly coordinates.pm. Therefor it does not run on my default perl installation. I'm not a perl guru, but can this dependency avoided? 87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-17T17:58:00.000Z-Dependency on coordinates.pm11

Oh, yes I have add something in the last days and not change the zip. I will fix this in the next days. This is a package from me for geocoordinates. I will check this also with this script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-17T21:04:00.000Z-87.212.82.171-2009-03-17T17:58:00.000Z11

On the Dutch wikipedia we have als a template called Unreferenced to include references. As follows: {{Unreferenced|date=maart 2009}}

Can you include this in your perl script? 87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-17T19:17:00.000Z-Errorcode 311

 Ok, I have change this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-17T21:06:00.000Z-87.212.82.171-2009-03-17T19:17:00.000Z11

Hi, I saw this case of a closing </div> with no opening counterpart. Possibly detect such cases? no rush, we're busy enough on French Wiki  ;) -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-19T01:35:00.000Z-New detection for < /div >11

This is also a good idea. At the moment I don't check the div-tag. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-19T10:41:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-19T01:35:00.000Z11

hello Stefan, On French Wiki, we have some error with low severity, and with multiple detection ( > 6000 ! ) When your script analyses a dump, it stops before ending because max of 40,000 errors is reached. With this mechanism, some "high severity" errors are not detected. I think it is a good idea to limit the number of "low severity" errors to 20,000 (or other value), to give chance to all "high severity" errors to be detected [ or any other variant : limit the number of errors per case, ..... ] ? Al1 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-2009-03-19T07:34:00.000Z-wiki with lots of errors french wiki11

At the moment I design a new system. The result is that not every day all articles with errors will be checked. So I only check for every error maximum 100 articles. If my script found in this 100 article only 60 articles with this error, then I check more 40 articles with this error. So the time for the scans will be shorter. For example if an error was found 20000 times, then I check only the 100 articles for the output and not more at one day. So I will fix this problem in the next time. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-19T10:48:00.000Z-Al1-2009-03-19T07:34:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, this new error did not detect anything in French nor Deutsch (still awaiting English report). I have no example to show, but it sounds suspect that nothing is detected at all. -- Laddo 199.22.61.2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-199.22.61.2-2009-03-18T16:52:00.000Z-No detection by error 58 (Section title all in uppercase)11

Also nothing in en, so I will change the length from 10 to 8. I have test my script with 10 and it works very well. --sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-19T10:40:00.000Z-199.22.61.2-2009-03-18T16:52:00.000Z11

Fair, then , thanks -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-20T01:43:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-19T10:40:00.000Z11

Using wikilink on the title in the text has a valid use when <onlyinclude> is used for transclusion in other pages (portals etc). This is often used on the introduction/summary at least at nowiki. Stigmj Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stigmj-2009-03-13T12:45:00.000Z-Title in text 311

It is ok, if it is in the namespace of portals (Nr. 100/101). But my script search only in the article-namespace (Nr. 0) and in the namespace of files (Nr. 6). See: namespace for de and namespace for no. I think it is not a good idea to link in this two namespace at the title. Maybe you can give me a better example. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-13T19:51:00.000Z-Stigmj-2009-03-13T12:45:00.000Z11

We use pages in the portal-namespace which transclude pages from the article-namespace. This is a perfectly valid usecase in nowiki, and requires the article in namespace 0 to have a link to itself in the text. There has also been discussions about using transclusion of featured articles on the mainpage, which on nowiki is in namespace 0 as well. Stigmj Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stigmj-2009-03-15T15:09:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-13T19:51:00.000Z11

Hello Stigmj, can you give me an example for an article. So that I can see where the problem is or how I can solve this. Thanks! -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T15:26:00.000Z-Stigmj-2009-03-15T15:09:00.000Z11

no:Deltaprosjektet ist en typisches Beispiel. MfG BjørnN Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-BjørnN-2009-03-16T16:01:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-15T15:26:00.000Z11

I understand! But I think the <onlyinclude> tag should only insert in template-pages. In German we have this rule and I think in English it is the same. At the moment in nowiki the script found 386 articles and in the output of 200 I found only 20 articles with the construct ]]''', which is an indicator for this onlyinclude problem. I think you should fix this 10% or you fix the other articles and then you deactivate this error in nowiki. At the moment I don't see a chance to change this in my script. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T19:44:00.000Z-BjørnN-2009-03-16T16:01:00.000Z11

We have deactivated this error in nowiki. I have fixed almost 100 of them, so there should be about 300 left. Is it possible to put the list of remaining articles at my userpage no:Bruker:Wikijens/checkwikipedia and I can fix the remaining errors without creating problems for pages that are being transcluded? Wikijens Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Wikijens-2009-03-21T13:46:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-16T19:44:00.000Z11

 Ok, I have create this page. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-21T15:56:00.000Z-Wikijens-2009-03-21T13:46:00.000Z11

Thanks. Wikijens Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Wikijens-2009-03-21T16:00:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-21T15:56:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, the individual output for new detectons 56 (Arrow art) starts one character too late, like:

...->[[Catégorie:Chronologie de la sociologie|*1944 en... −− should display the full --> at the start

If possible, it would be even better if you could output a few characters before the faulty arrow, so that it would be easier to see if the case is really "arrow art" or if it is the mismatched ending of a comment, like this one was:

...{{Portail|sociologie}}-->[[Catégorie:Chronologie de la sociologie|*1944 en...

I guess 10-12 characters before the arrow would be enough, if at all possible. Thanks -- Puzzled Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-20T01:56:00.000Z-Truncated output for error 56 (Arrow art)11

---

BTW it reported this false positive in this article:

L<small>i</small> <= dispo<small>i</small>

---

Finally (!) would it make sense to also detect "<->" (↔) and "<=>" (⇔) ? -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-20T02:35:00.000Z-Truncated output for error 56 (Arrow art)11

I can change this with the letter before. Also I can include "<->" (↔) and "<=>" (⇔). No Problem. Why is this a false positive in this article? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-20T07:27:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-20T02:35:00.000Z11

These two characters " <= " in fr:Algorithme du banquier mean "smaller or equal" -- this rule should detect " <== ", three characters. I cannot understand why it gets detected and reported here. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-20T23:26:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-20T07:27:00.000Z11

If it mean "smaller or equal" than please use <math>. My script only detect "<-", "<=", "=>" and "->". So I get also all "<===" and so on. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-21T12:27:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-20T23:26:00.000Z11

Ah, I see. I though you were only detecting three-character sequences. No worries. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-22T00:43:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-21T12:27:00.000Z11

The translation source text (for Japanese) has extra </nowiki> for error 57 and 58:

error_057_desc_script=One headline in this article end with a colon <nowiki>"== Headline : =="</nowiki>. This colon can be deleted.</nowiki>.

--fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Fryed-peach-2009-03-20T17:42:00.000Z-Extra </nowiki>11

This is right, but where is the problem? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-21T12:30:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-03-20T17:42:00.000Z11

error_057_desc_script and error_058_desc_script contain a closing </nowiki>. but no opening <nowiki>. Please delete the unnecessary </nowiki>. from both error_057_desc_script and error_058_desc_script. Thank you! --UV Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-UV-2009-03-21T15:48:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-21T12:30:00.000Z11

 Ok, thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-22T06:33:00.000Z-UV-2009-03-21T15:48:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, as you know several projects had deactivated error 42 about the <small>; this is basically because it's not a deprecated tag, it's difficult to explain how to fix the "error", and also because there are semantic reasons to not use a span instead of a small [2]. I've a little proposal to change or to split the error, in order at least to detect the "bad use" of the small in those projects. I'll give you some examples:

• small inside a ref, like <ref><small>text of the footnote</small></ref>: this is bad, since the text size for the references is already set to 90%; another small will produce x-small text
• small inside an image caption, like [[Image:X.png|thumb|<small>Description.</small>]]; again, it's already set to 94% in the stylesheet, and it's also a bad practice
• double small, like <small><small>text</small></small>
• small opened but not closed with </small>

I'm sure you and the others can think about more examples and a way to reduce the false positives. If you split the error it'll be just a bit more easy to explain, for example:

• error 42, article with a 'small' tag: don't use it if it's not really necessary
• error 63, bad use of the 'small' tag: you should never do this...

and then, every project can choose to deactivate error 42 or to keep both active. Unfortunately, the main interpretation problem of error 42 will remain, so the best solution is to change error 42 completely. I hope it's clear enough. --Red Power Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Red Power-2009-03-18T16:06:00.000Z-A solution for the 11

This is a good idea, I will create more errors. If you have more examples, then tell me this here. --sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-19T10:39:00.000Z-Red Power-2009-03-18T16:06:00.000Z11

I've just found this: [3]. I don't think that a small inside or before  or  is a good idea. --Red Power Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Red Power-2009-03-22T18:02:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-19T10:39:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, on cawiki the script found an error on ca:Introducció_a_la_teoria_de_grups#Grups_de_Galois:

:<math alt="x = (menys b més menys l'arrelquadrada de (b al quadrat menys 4 a c)) over 2a">x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a}.</math>

{-b \pm \sqrt {b^2-4ac}} is considered a template with a non correct begin but it is not a template.

Tschüs!. --Loupeter Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Loupeter-2009-03-22T11:38:00.000Z-Template not correct begin11

 Ok, I change my script. Thanks for this info. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-22T11:42:00.000Z-Loupeter-2009-03-22T11:38:00.000Z11

Could you please check what the error is here. Maybe there is something wrong in the translation, that is screwing up the table. Thanks. GoEThe Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-GoEThe-2009-03-22T17:34:00.000Z-DEFAULTSORT wiki-pt11

 Ok, I change this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-22T18:03:00.000Z-GoEThe-2009-03-22T17:34:00.000Z11

GoEThe, there is no table for that report, but only the links to the articles. --Red Power Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Red Power-2009-03-22T19:15:00.000Z-DEFAULTSORT wiki-pt11

Hi Stefan

Is it possible to exclude articles with just one character in the title from this scan? These articles are often about symbols or letters in a particular alphabet, and not too easy to sort alphabetically. --Helt Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Helt-2009-03-22T12:38:00.000Z-DEFAULTSORT with special letters11

Yes, this is possible. But at the moment I work at an other big problem. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T09:12:00.000Z-Helt-2009-03-22T12:38:00.000Z11

Your script has found this error in sv:8 Flora, but I can't see why. Can you please check if this is a false positive? /Sten André Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Sten André-2009-03-23T20:55:00.000Z-Template not correct begin, error number 4711

The problem is the line "|omloppsbana_ref = <ref name=JPL>{{JPL}} Läst 6 februari 2009}}</ref>". -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T21:30:00.000Z-Sten André-2009-03-23T20:55:00.000Z11

As description my script think at this point that there is the end of the "Infobox planet". So it found later the correct end and say, sorry there is no begin. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T21:32:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T21:30:00.000Z11

Within this category also headers consisting of numbers are listed, which should be excluded. --seismos Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Iwoelbern-2009-03-22T08:50:00.000Z-Headlines with capitalization11

 Ok, I have change this. Only A-Z will be counted. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-22T10:54:00.000Z-Iwoelbern-2009-03-22T08:50:00.000Z11

Now we have an other problem. I will change this tomorrow. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T09:11:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-22T10:54:00.000Z11

I saw a couple more:

1. Exclude any < ref > from the scan of this detection , see fr:115e régiment d'infanterie de ligne
2. For a title to be uppercase, most characters must be uppercase, though not necessary all:

• fr:15e régiment d'artillerie got this false positive : « === Restauration, Monarchie de Juillet , Second Empire , IIIe République jusqu'à la Première Guerre mondiale === »
• fr:161e régiment d'infanterie de ligne got correctly identified with « ==== PERTES DU 161e REGIMENT D’INFANTERIE AU COURS DE LA CAMPAGNE 1914-1918 ==== » despite that it contained some lowercase

Possibly report it only if at least 80% of alphabetical characters are uppercase.

-- Laddo 199.22.57.2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-199.22.57.2-2009-03-23T11:50:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T09:11:00.000Z11

At the moment my script has a big bug. It count all big letters. So there is many false positive. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T13:34:00.000Z-199.22.57.2-2009-03-23T11:50:00.000Z11

Also - look for <10 chars words made only with capital letters, so it wont find "Różnice między kodowaniami MS-DOS CP852 a IBM CP852" (in Polish: "Differences between codepages MS-DOS CP852 and IBM CP852"). Looking for headlines with >80% capital letters may cause further problems. Matma Rex answer me on plwiki Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Matma Rex-2009-03-24T16:19:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-23T13:34:00.000Z11

Another, better example: "XXXVIII FMFT - 2007" - roman year and abbreviation. Matma Rex answer me on plwiki Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Matma Rex-2009-03-24T16:20:00.000Z-Matma Rex-2009-03-24T16:19:00.000Z11

Fail on Ascii art: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sommatie

87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-23T22:28:00.000Z-Ascii art11

No, it is correct. See line "In [[C (programmeertaal)|C]]/[[C++]]/[[C sharp#|C]]/[[Java (programmeertaal)|Java]] kan je deze code gebruiken, mits n, m en x zijn ''int''-types. Dat x een ''array'' is. En dat <code>m</code> <= <code>n</code>:"

There you find a "<=" this is an arrow. If you mean "smaller or equal" then use <math> for this phrase. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-24T07:47:00.000Z-87.212.82.171-2009-03-23T22:28:00.000Z11

Ah yes I see. Thanks! 87.212.82.171 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-87.212.82.171-2009-03-25T10:30:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-24T07:47:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, On this specific case, Error #43 is detected. I don't know if it's really a bug ? Al1 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-2009-03-25T11:08:00.000Z-error #4311 {{Infobox Communes de France | nomcommune=Argonay [...] | géoloc-département= |}}

What is the name of the article? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-25T12:25:00.000Z-Al1-2009-03-25T11:08:00.000Z11

I forgot to mention it ! http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argonay&oldid=39267266 . Al1 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-2009-03-25T13:09:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-25T12:25:00.000Z11

It is a bug, but I have no idea how to detect this. In a template with parameter like "nomcommune=XYZ" it is an bug. But in other templates without "parameter=value" it is not a bug. For this problem I need a list with parameter for every template. This is not possible. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-25T13:35:00.000Z-Al1-2009-03-25T13:09:00.000Z11

OK. On detections of today, I've changed |}} to | }} to avoid the detection, even if it's a bug. It happens very few times. Thanks for information. Al1 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Al1-2009-03-25T19:41:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-25T13:35:00.000Z11

Per a comment at [4], I was wondering if it would be possible for you to modify the script to update the page on Wikipedia directly, rather than generating if on the toolserver. I see that you have some other things to deal with, so take your time... it's not really urgent or anything. Thanks for your time and this great script! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-25T17:01:00.000Z-Reformat?11

Sorry, I am not a good programmer. I can only write this script for creating this output, but I have no idea how to modify a page at Wikipedia directly. If you found a way how I can make this with perl, I will try this. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-26T04:19:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-03-25T17:01:00.000Z11

Okay; I thought it was worth asking. I don't know anything about using Perl. Thanks anyway! -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-26T14:31:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-26T04:19:00.000Z11

fyi --AwOc Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-AwOc-2009-03-29T13:10:00.000Z-en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Check Wikipedia#I am not able to update the page..11

A similar suggestion for splitting was done here: fr:Discussion Wikipédia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia#Affichage des erreurs -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-29T18:12:00.000Z-en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Check Wikipedia#I am not able to update the page..11

I set the limit from 100 to 50 article per error. Tomorrow the size of the page will be smaller. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-29T20:02:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-29T18:12:00.000Z11

Hi Stefan, your new statistics are much informative and interesting! The new links in the summary are very useful too, since in French Wikipedia where there are still so many detections. I am a bit confused with the new statements that appear in the report : at the top, you still indicate « improvement in 30468 articles », which is not the same number as « Today the script scan 7400 articles ». Is it possible to explain the new scheme that you have put in place ?

A couple of typos to correct:

• With the last scan the script checked 7400 articles. At the moment the script identified 33002 ideas for improvements in 30468 articles.
• Today the script scanned 7400 articles
• ...articles with errors from last dump or scan

-- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-30T23:39:00.000Z-Feed-back on new statistics11

Hello Laddo, thanks for the correction of my English text. I will insert this tonight. Now the explain: If my script found in the dump 90000 errors in 60000 articles, then every day the script would scan this 60000 articles. This was a problem of time and resources. I think with some more errors I need more then 24 hours. So I change my script complete. I scan the full dump and find 90000 errors in 60000 articles. But now I only scan all new articles and change articles. For example I find in this scans 100 times the error nr.50, so I need not to scan one more of this 60000 articles for error nr.50. If the script only found 90 times of error nr.50 so I will scan the next 10 of 60000 with this error nr.50. If in this 10 I found only 2 new of error nr. 50 I will scan the next 8 of 60000 with this error nr.50 and so on. - With this work process I can improve the speed of a scan. Now it is possible to have more then 40000 errors (see en). With the next scan also in fr we see more then 40000 articles. :-) Thank at all in French Wikipedia for the good work. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T08:09:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-30T23:39:00.000Z11

Hi again Stefan, the improvement is great, your daily scan will never have to scan more than new+modified+as many identified bad as necessary, likely less than 10.000 even for largest Wikipedias! It would be best if it was possible to go over that list of 40000 during the full dump scan, though.

Thinking of it, I see that you are still scanning files that you knew contained an error and were not modified. If you go one step further and keep the list of defective articles separately for each error type, you could save even more processing by keeping track of articles and errors that were previously identified. Let me illustrate:

Say that detection nr.50 found 3000 errors in 3000 articles in the last dump. In the first report, you list 50 errors, and 35 of them get corrected by contributors during that day. The next day,

1) you scan 2100 new articles and find 5 brand new errors nr.50 (5 found so far, out of 2100 scanned)

2) you scan 4850 modified articles and find 4 new errors nr.50 (9 found so far, out of 6950 scanned)

3) now since you need 41 more errors nr.50 in order to list them in today's report, you can get back to your previous list of 3000, filter out those that were modified and re-scanned since [they were processed by step 2 above], so that there are, let's say, 2700 of those articles still unchanged since that previous scan. Then you can pick the first 41 errors of that list and put them in today's report (50 found, still only 6950 articles scanned).

4) If you maintain that list of 3000 by removing modified (and re-scanned) ones and adding newly found errors, then next day you will have a list of 3000 minus 300 plus 9 = 2709 articles with that error nr.50.

At then end, you would only ever scan new or modified articles on a daily basis. Once a first full scan has been made for a given detection nr., it would incrementally maintain the list of articles where that type of error was found, without ever re-scanning an unchanged article.

The full scan would remain necessary only for new detections or to catch modified articles that your script would not be aware of.

I don't know if all of this is feasible, it would require that you separately maintain the list of articles for each type of detection (and the text of each error in each article); all that data could become messy. Think of it anyhow, and thanks again for your invaluable contribution to Wikipedia.  ;)

-- Laddo 199.22.57.2 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-199.22.57.2-2009-03-31T17:37:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T08:09:00.000Z11

If I understand all text right, then it this my workflow. First I scan only new and change articles. And if I don't found 50 of one error, then I scan the next articles from the big list with only this error. Maybe I don't understand it right or I don't describe my script not right. :-) -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T19:00:00.000Z-199.22.57.2-2009-03-31T17:37:00.000Z11

What you explained is clear: I understand that you maintain ONE big list of articles for all errors, from which you re-scan only when you need extra cases for a given type of detection. What I suggest is to maintain one list FOR EACH TYPE of detection, so that you would not need to scan them at all. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-03-31T21:50:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T19:00:00.000Z11

But my script produce this "for each type list" on the fly from the "big list". This is very easy and fast. With more list I have more problems to update and so on. I see not the improvement of this "for each type list". Did you need this "single error lists"? -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-01T11:25:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-03-31T21:50:00.000Z11

OK, what you do is simpler and fast, all good. -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-04-02T02:19:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-01T11:25:00.000Z11

Occasionally templates don't work as invisible unicode characters get into the fields. Mediawiki strips whitespace and the like, but not these. This leads to parserfunctions not working. Would it be possible to check for these?

The characters would be (\u200E|\uFEFF|\u200B). Possibly there are uses for these, but I doubt. There is a related request at en:WT:AutoWikiBrowser/Feature_requests#Unicode_control_characters. -- User:Docu

I know this problem see this change. I will try to detect this character inside the template. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T07:57:00.000Z-Unicode control characters11

 Ok, new error nr. 16 "Template with Unicode control characters". -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-01T14:57:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T07:57:00.000Z11

Thanks. The other day I had to fix a whole series [5]. I updated the description for en.wp accordingly. -- User:Docu

Isn't error 16 still deactivated ? : error_016_prio_script=-1 -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-04-02T02:28:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-31T07:57:00.000Z11

@Laddo: copy the new translation at your page of translation. I have switch the old error 11 and 16 in complete new errors with new description. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-02T07:55:00.000Z-66.131.214.76-2009-04-02T02:28:00.000Z11

erledigtErledigt. Section "News" is a great idea too ! -- Laddo 66.131.214.76 Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-66.131.214.76-2009-04-03T00:57:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-02T07:55:00.000Z11

Some articles use bolds to emphasize something in their headlines. For example, ja:フランスにおける日本の漫画 has a headline "フランス語の '''{{lang|fr|manga}}''' という語について", which indicates "manga" is written in non-Japanese characters. I think such partial uses should be accepted. --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Fryed-peach-2009-03-03T03:19:00.000Z-Headlines with bold11

If this is a problem in Japan then deactivate this error. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-03T15:55:00.000Z-Fryed-peach-2009-03-03T03:19:00.000Z11

I thought that you might want to look at en:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia#Reformatting. -Drilnoth (Talk) Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Drilnoth-2009-03-20T18:08:00.000Z-Reformatting11

 Ok -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-03T15:56:00.000Z-Drilnoth-2009-03-20T18:08:00.000Z11

In no:wiki wurde folgenden Fehler entdeckt, ist aber kein Fehler:

{{veibilde|Floyen1024 019 new.jpg|På [[Nygårdstangen]] i [[Bergen]] møtes [[Image:Tabliczka E16.svg|24px|link=Europavei 16]], [[Image:Tabliczka E39.svg|24px|link=Europavei 39]] og {{riksvei|555}}.}}

MfG, BjørnN Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-BjørnN-2009-03-31T08:45:00.000Z-Template parameter with problem11

"unsuale" in error_060_desc_script is a typo? --fryed-peach Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Fryed-peach-2009-03-31T15:57:00.000Z-Template parameter with problem11

In plwiki in pl:szablon:związek chemiczny infobox are parameters:

• Pochodne ?
• ?

Those names of parameters issue errors in new error section, but they don't. Malarz pl Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Malarz pl-2009-03-31T19:41:00.000Z-Template parameter with problem11

Thanks for all informations. I will fix this as soon as possible. @Fryed-peach: Ok! @Fryed-peach: Now "?" is possible. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-01T03:58:00.000Z-Malarz pl-2009-03-31T19:41:00.000Z11

Here's another one: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limes. Sjabloon:Auteur does not need a parameter, but just text why copyright is violated. Rudolphous Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Rudolphous-2009-04-01T05:58:00.000Z-Stefan Kühn-2009-04-01T03:58:00.000Z11

At en.wp there is a series as well [6]. Interesting idea to add question marks to the parameters, but probably problematic in some applications. Anyways, if one sorts the templates by name, they are easy to spot. -- User:Docu

On pl.wiki:

pl:King Biscuit Flower Hour Presents: Deep Purple in Concert	Lista utworów, * "Highway star" (Blackmore/Gillan/Glover/Lord/Paice) * "Not Fade Away" (Petty/Hardin)
pl:Perfect Strangers	Lista utworów, * występuje tylko na kasetach i CD, brak na winylowym LP

In those two articles there are no errors. The '*' char is part of parameter value. Malarz pl Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Malarz pl-2009-04-09T19:53:00.000Z-Template parameter with problem11

hello,

we have some inconsistent "error 52" in French wiki too

sample here : [7]

the section is [8]

and the code : {{Événement à venir|nature=un [[:Catégorie:Projet de prolongement de transport en Île-de-France|projet de prolongement transport en Île-de-France]]|catégorie=[[Catégorie:Projet de prolongement de transport en Île-de-France]]}} the syntax is used to pass a category name to a generic template. I think you should'nt check category names inside model arguments.

tks

Al1

I think this is a bad example for a template. It is possible to make a categorie with a template. See de:Freital there is the city template for German cities. In one parameter we write "Bundesland=Sachsen" and this template generate the categorie Kategorie:Gemeinde in Sachsen (Village in the federal state Saxony). I think the same is possible in fr. Please ask in fr:Projet:Modèle. Maybe they can fix this problem. -- sk Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan K%C3%BChn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/M%C3%A4rz#c-Stefan Kühn-2009-03-13T20:06:00.000Z-error 52 (again)11